Up until the November elections of 2012, California was once regarded as the state with the harshest “Three Strikes” law in the country. Before Proposition 36 was passed, Prop 184, most commonly known as the “Three Strikes” law, imposed harsher sentencing for repeating offenders. When passed by voters in 1994, second time offenders received double the prison sentence of the first felony, while third time offenders would receive 25 years to life in prison. As a direct result of the “Three Strikes” law, in 2011 8,800 inmates were serving prison terms in California’s prison system. After passing with a 69% voter approval rating, Proposition 36 modifies parts of California’s “Three Strikes” law that would change future sentencing and would allow the possibility for re-sentencing for convicted felons.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Families to be Reunited After the Passing of Prop 36

By Joseph LeGarreta

Abstract

With the passing of proposition 36 and the repeal of the Three Strikes Law in California, relatives of incarcerated family members are rejoicing after years of fighting for their loved ones. 66-year-old Teresa Valdez is one such person. Ever since her son had fallen victim to the Three Strikes Law, forced to serve a 53 year to life sentence on possession of marijuana, she has been a staunch activist in repealing the law. At a protest rally in 2009 Valdez despairingly told a reporter, "I will not be here to see my son released." Little did she know, only a few years later the law which put her son behind bars would be repealed, and she would have a chance at seeing him again. Barbara Ellis whose brother was sentenced to 25 years to life an another small charge commented, "Oh my God, I'm just so elated and grateful...It's not just my brother who has been incarcerated. I've been incarcerated, waiting for him." Now it is only a matter of time before these concerned family members are reunited with their loved ones.

Analysis

Since the Three Strikes Law was passed in 1994, masses of law breakers have received unreasonable sentences on small charges. Valdez's son was given 53 years to life on a simple drug possession charge for a drug that is now legal for recreational use in two states. Ellis's brother was sentenced to 25 years to life on a charge that normally would have called for 1 to 3 years at most. Ellis who is the founder and president of the FILO (Families of Incarcerated Loved Ones) organization says, "We've seen fathers taken from their children for life for stealing pizza, mothers locked up for 25 to life for possession of marijuana. Many family members have died or are too sick to celebrate a new life for their family." For individuals in such situations, the Three Strikes Law is simply inhumane. It is no secret that California is running out of space in it's prisons, and the cost of retaining inmates is going up. There is no reason to keep small-time offenders locked up when they aren't truly hurting anyone and could better benefit society by doing such things as community service.


I believe this photograph says a lot about the hardships of the families of incarcerated inmates and what they have to go through. Phrases on this poster such as, "Incarcerated Families" and "Stolen Lives" really stand out to me. What would it be like to be in their shoes?

No comments:

Post a Comment